Another old man is being charged with Nazi war crimes.
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/07/2 ... tment.htmlI don't know how the rest of you feel, particularly since most of the remaining forum members are European and the war affected you far more directly than it did us but...
In my opinion, it's really rather pointless. The war ended 65 years ago. And no American has ever really been charged with war crimes. The My Lai massacre in Vietnam was a glaring example of a lack of justice. Bush and cohorts should definitely be facing charges over their fabricated war on terror and the idiocy of false pretences leading to the invasion of Iraq.
Why is it that once or twice a year, some 90 year old man is charged with Nazi war crimes for being a camp guard? Other than purely symbolic, what's the bloody point? It's not justice so much as feel-good publicity and petty revenge in my view. And beyond that, really, how much choice did low ranking guards have? "I'm sorry Mein Fuhrer. I realise that you will kill me and my entire family but I really strongly disagree with the Final Solution and don't want to be in the German military at all." It's not as if you could have been a conscientious objector in Nazi Germany.
And the greater criminals on the Nazi side already had their trials at Nuremberg. Those that weren't executed, and didn't commit suicide, were given nice cushy jobs in America. Justice is often self-serving and the self being served rarely, if ever, involves the victims. Prosecuting the aged for being a camp guard 65 years ago is meaningless and absurd in my opinion.