Such consequences do not possess ready-made answers. It is, therefore, vitally important that would-be parents pay exceedingly close attention to the personal and social – as well as the financial – responsibilities of parenthood.

This matter is not isolated to life expectancy, however. Consider, for example, how a child may view a parent who is clearly older than the parents of their peers. This perspective will inevitably shape the child’s relationship with their parent, as well as influencing his or her self-image. The social context must also be considered, since juvenile interactions are unlikely to be tactful where difference is concerned.

Events of this nature must be carefully anticipated by the parents and addressed with sensitivity and support; supposing that such happenings are simply part and parcel of growing up is most definitely not the answer.

Caring for the emotional needs of a child is perhaps the most crucial ‘intangible’ of parenting, which no amount of money and material comfort can replace. If an older parent cannot ensure this aspect is readily available, I find their choice to become a parent to be a rather selfish one.

It is difficult, with the above points in mind, to contend that older parents are in the best interests of the child, although there will inevitably be exceptions. I have little doubt, however, that these are the exceptions that prove the rule. Hence I am persuaded that, with medical technology re-setting the natural boundaries of parenthood, it is high time more consideration were given to this matter. After all, if child welfare is our prime concern, I can think of few better priorities to pursue.

Comment on the Forums